Dance review, Pisando Ovos, 30 000, 2007
Zo folks - onderstaande review zoals beloofd, en zoals gepubliceerd in het Galicisch theatermagazine.
Enfin, dat mag men vermoeden. Het beloofde proefexemplaar moet er nog aankomen.
Dus ofwel:
a) zijn de Galiciërs toch evenveel een volk van loze beloftes als de meer mediterrane mede-Spanjaarden
b) is het intussen failliet gegaan, zoals veel (ook uitstekende) kunstkritische magazines regelmatig beschoren is
c) verschijnt het tweejaarlijks, zoals wel meer van die kunstkritische toenstanden
In ieder geval, volgend is voor hen bijeengeschreven. Van dans heb ik me lang afzijdig gehouden, maar de ene lokkende uitzondering maakt vaak een regel. Zo ook hier. Zonder één lijntje tekst - een houvast voor een taalpersoon - zat ik dit keer op het puntje van mijn stoel; zweefde er soms zelfs boven, wegens flink emotioneel aangesproken. Jawel, folks, angst en identificatie wisselen af in een vreemd spervuur. Daarvan gesproken: goed vuurwerk was het dit jaar. Drop eens een comment, en laat weten hoeveel vingers het u heeft gekost!
Alice in Clubberland
Place some lights on a scaffold in an industrial space. Attach a high-voltage spot to a rotating metal arm. Then retire for a few months of reflexion and pop out a dramaturgic baby that immerses the audience in a mesmerising physical, emotional and sensorial immersion bath. That is Ruth Balvin and David Loira’s answer to “What would you do with €30 000?”, also the questioning subtitle on the lavish goldcoloured leaflet to their new play: 30 000.
With that subtitle, a baroque play or a political statement on subsidising could be suspected. None of that, though, and that’s only the first of many mental “trompe l’oeils”. In a sparse set at the industrially bare Sala Nasa, the two makers, ex-students at the London Contemporary Dance School and professors at Vigo academy, carry out their own, seemingly equally sparse, choreography.
Though their corporeal dialogue may seem simple, it never bores. They are supported by a soundtrack going from Purcell-ish arias over poppish ballads to triphop, techno and hardrock and build on their minimal scene to transform the room in a dehumanised clubbing scene, bedroom, rock concert or golf lawn. Mostly though, the audience’s imagination is their tool. Staying completely emotionally void in their physical dialogue, the music takes over the role of emotion conveyor. Distortion is used as a musical sign of confusion, lyrics speak what the robotlike doubtfulness of the dancers’ shields, and reverbs stretch out to an all too realistic post-clubbing earbuzz. Finally, some unsuspected sensory attacks challenge the audience, even physically, to become part of the experience.
Like Alice in Clubberland, we are catapulted into an experience where the dancers are depersonalised as every clubber is, even wearing uniform glitter dresses. Any uniform is acceptable if it makes you fit in. Reduced to mere puppets, symbols for the viewer’s own experiences, they need only follow the rules of music, lighting and the few props. In such a universe, it’s no wonder that real emotional moments represent the biggest void, the greatest clumsiness and silence. Concerning feelings nothing could dictate to the dancers – and it renders their bodies speechless.
The atmosphere is dark and loaded with sense and sensorial experiences. Nevertheless, this performance succeeds in walking the line between exclamation and sterility, a line sliced thinner yet by their jagged evocation of contemporary life in the fast lane.
Voor één keertje en Anglais,
Celia Ledoux